For the past year the Australian Chinese community have been utilising a volunteer safe response network on the WeChat social networking application. Worried Chinese commnunity members told me that the netwrok was created due to the lack of police assistance.
The WeChat social page is named (紧急呼救 Jinjihujiu) ‘Emergency Help’. By subscribing to the WeChat page, you are able to to then instantly apply for a volunteer group for within your state.
Everyday there are designated call takers within the group who post their contact details. Upon receiving the details of an emergency, the call taker will send the closest volunteers within the vicinity of the incident.
An administrator of the volunteer project told me that they have a total of 30 000 members within more than 800 WeChat groups nationwide. He said the the network was growing rapidly every month, as Chinese people feel that local police are not apathetic to their situation.
“Whites first, officials second, minorities third, Han fourth” a saying used to describe the unfairness within modern Chinese society soon became reality for me.
I had my reasons to leave Australia and it was mostly to do with the bamboo ceiling. I fathomed I could take a paycut if it meant competing on equal ground. The theory about the ceiling is all out there writing but in my last few part times jobs I’ve had, I could actually feel it as well, Asian colleagues who had not been promoted due to ‘lack of leadership’ reasons.
Since I was able to read, write and speak Chinese Mandarin fluent enough to even masquerade as a native, I thought I would also have an upper hand in competing for jobs against other foreigners. Sadly, I could not have been more wrong.
One such case when I applied for a copywriter position, which advertised a nice 25k per month salary (55k AUD per annum). They handed me an assessment and small interview. Everything went smoothly but for some reason they had yet to contact me so I took the initiative.
Found this quite odd, considering I told him I was a native speaker…
I proceeded to call ‘Leon’ and he explained to me that it was not his fault but the company wanted a Caucasian copywriter only in name, he had to show up at board meetings as well as a ‘foreign expert’. He told me that the company felt like it would give a good impression for investors as well.
Fair enough so I went on my way to apply for more jobs, as this was just my first setback. That’s when history began to repeat itself. One such time was when I showed up in Haidian, Beijing for a job interview, they were surprised that I was Asian. I mean, they should’ve seen my Chinese last name on my resume but anyway I just went along with it, explaining that I was born in Australia. They, however, said sorry that they filled up their foreigner quota for the company recently. Which is odd, since the next guy they interviewed was a White guy…I guess he could’ve been born and raised in China?
Eventually I stopped speaking Chinese in interviews altogether, I found it to be a handicap. The interviewers were very gracious and treated me very well when I only spoke English, but as soon as I switched to Chinese, the tone changed to something much more assertive. By only speaking English in interviews, I eventually was offered jobs. There you have it, the trick for me to finding a job in China, was to not speak Chinese during interviews.
Still, I was restless and unhappy about the status quo I wanted to find out why this was happening. I never wanted to teach English, but I knew that it was probably the biggest industry for foreigners in China so I went out to interview a recruiter.
I hit up one of the English recruiter agents for an interview. She worked as a recruiter for Renmin University’s affiliated highschool and knew the innerworkings of the industry.
“It really is like this in this industry, they only care about skin colour and nationality. Actually they only care about the skin colour. And…Russians even get a chance to teach English instead of the people from America but his parents are Asian. Within the current situation there both positives and negatives, as many people will look at them with certain expectations, feeling that White people really are privileged.”
I made friends with some local Chinese teaching English in China. The gulf was even larger for them. Yes, they could get hired but one person told me he was working up to 40+ hours a week with no leave, whilst his White colleague worked only around 10 hours. Respectively he earned around 8k RMB a month and his colleague earned 22k RMB a month. He said
“They used the foreigners’ face to get customers but use our labour to teach the children”.
He felt like it was not really the companies fault but more the parents. They associate the English language and quality with White skin so therefore all want White teachers.
To be honest, I felt bad after interviewing him, that he knew that he was being shafted but could not do much about it. If he had not told me he was born in China, I would have thought he was Asian American, his accent was impeccable. Alas, the deepseated societal issues of White worship still nestles deep within Chinese society.
According to the local Australian Chinese media publications Melbourne Today and Melbourne WeLife, anti-Chinese posters have been plastered around prestigious universities such as Monash University and the University of Melbourne.
No Chinese are allowed within this area. If intrusion occurs, deportation will likely happen.
Posters were emblazoned with the National Union of Students (NUS), Chinese Students and Scholars Association (CSSA) and the Monash Students Association Logos (MSA).
The CSSA have already replied that the logos were used without their consent and they do not in anyway support the messages written on the offensive flyers.
Melbourne Today reported that Chinese native speakers were able to work out the discrepancies and grammatical errors within the flyers. For instance, there was a Japanese Kanji character used in place of the Chinese Hanzi character 将, showing that the creator of the flyers most likely had a poor grasp of cultural differences. The grammar and sentence structure is also very robotic, likely due to translation software use.
Furthermore they reported that the Melbourne International Students Clubs found an hyperlink to the Antipodean Resistance website on the back of one of the flyers.
Antipodean Resistance, a white nationalist group, seem to be the most likely source of these flyers. It is most likely they used the logos of the NUS, MSA and CSSA to spread their hateful messages towards the Chinese community and to sow discord among Melburnians.
An information session on the safe schools program targetting the Chinese community was held today at the Melbourne headquarters of the Liberal Party. It was organised by ex-Hotham candidate George Hua and featured Deakin MP Michael Sukkar as the main guest speaker. The Event titled “Do you support sex ed being taught to your children earlier? Australia’s “Safe Schools Program” is it safe?” and was touted as being a purely informational event.
This event had been advertised through various Chinese media groups such as AusFocus and HighFun media, whose target audiences are generally first generation Chinese migrants.
It is likely the information could biased judging from the flyer pictured above, that were being handed out at the event. Dan Xie, whose contact details are on the fliers, had already told The Age last year that he was protecting Chinese culture.
Since I am of Chinese background, I decided to try and contact Mr Xie, on how he could claim to be representing the culture of over a billion very diverse people. Sadly, I could not reach Mr Xie through phone nor the WeChat. If he does reply, I will update it here with his response.
The Chinese flyer is written differently from the English version.
Have you heard of the Safe Schools Program?
The Safe Schools program educates children by teaching them to act like homosexuals and bisexuals, so that they will conform to new age ideas of gender, by letting student select which uniform and bathroom they wish to use.
The curriculum is setup like this: lesson one [Creating a safe space] (Page 10); lesson two [Same Sex Experiences] (pages 10-11); lesson three[Bisexual Experiences] (pages 11-12); lesson four [Transgender Experiences] (pages 12-13); lesson five [Intersex Experiences].
This is to indoctrinate children about the diversity of sexuality, schools will encourage children to see homosexuality and other orientations as equal so that they will experiment, experience and choose out of their own accord.
Please sign this national petition! New South Wales have already reached 17000 signatories, Victoria has already more than 5000.
Oppose [Safe Schools Program] curriculum’s indoctrination of children into new trendy sexualities!
Oppose the indoctrination of children with the concept of sexual diversity!
Protect the basic rights of parents and children’s futures!
Various Chinese social media companies have been misleading and sometimes directly lying to their readers for views. The fake news is most dangerous in that many of the readers are first generation Chinese migrants, who are on permant residency visas or have just recently attained citizenship. This means they either prefer media in their native tongue or are constrained by language barriers, forcing them to read social media for their news.
Here is a recent example of misleading WeChat news, in regards to the government’s decision to compensate refugees, who suffered harm under detainment, with $70 million AUD.
AuWe News (澳洲微报), published an article filled with misleading information about refugees.
“Bad News! 1905 refugees have sued the Australian Government! Each getting 150 thousand in compensation! Paid by Australian taxpayers!”
AuWe News media’s article misleads the reader by instead of just reporting the news, they go down to the depths of all the benefits and welfare that refugees can claim. Implying as though that refugees are coming to Australia to freeload on welfare benefits. Such as saying that Centrelink can pay each refugee up to $1600 a month.
Other WeChat publications have also published equally misleading information regarding refugees. Australian Web (澳洲网）such as their article which illustrates that somehow Permanent Residents (PRs) are in competition directly with refugees for government resources.
”This really hurts! The Australian government treat refugees far better than PR holders! Compensation illegal refugees 70 million! Each person 150 thousand!
Many readers were infuriated by the news and subequently shared the articles.
“This where all the tax goes. No wonder utility fees are rising.”
“The Australian government is on a dangerous path (Chinese idiom: riding a tiger they cannot dismount from)”
Soon, enough more and more people joined the mob and launched into comments section. The top rated comment being extremely violent:
This stupid cunt government should have died a long time ago! Politicians should let the refugees live in their homes! Fuck :cleaveremotesx3
The second most liked the commentor thinks that refugees have easier lives than Australian citizens
“This just shows that being a citizen isn’t as good as being a refugee! The Australian government does not welcome educated people who come by plane with money, they are more welcoming to people who come here on boat without any warning, as long as you get here you wont go back empty handed! Now you’ve given them money, this will become an advertisement for more illegal refugees. Just need to wait for two years, don’t need to work, just stay put, then you can be compensated the ten times the earnings of actual locals. The Australian government has already decided the future and quality of our citizens.
This shows the dangerous effect this types of media has had on first generation migrants, convincing them to think that refugees and asylum seekers are all coming here to reap the benefits welfare, without telling about the dangers they face back home.
Also an important note is that these types of comments can be found all across the internet on right wing news pages, so this should only be taken as an illustration of the effects of misleading social media news.
The Australian government needs to have a way to combat the rise of various right wing social media pages promoting hate and divide within the Chinese community.
While browsing WeChat, I spotted a social media post related to Safe Schools by Chinese Liberal Association leader, Kelvin Ho. I have covered former Councillor Ho before on his homophobic views, where he used a slippery slope argument to equate homosexuality with bestiality.
First part of the post was just a simple screenshot of his iPhone Notes, detailing an event.
Second part of the post was a link to sign up to the event which is related to Safe Schools. You can find it here, . The event is an ”Afternoon Tea Information Session with Liberal party members” with regards to a dicussion about Safe Schools.
The event will be held on Sunday, 25th of June at the Victorian Liberal HQ in the Melbourne CBD, free entry. Official title of the the event is
“Do you support sex ed being taught to your children earlier? Australia’s “Safe Schools Program” is it “safe”?
Michael Sukkar – Member for Deakin
A notable guest is the now infamous Michael Sukkar MP, currently under investigation for contempt of the court. Mr Sukkar has spoken out against safe school legislation in the past.
“…the Safe Schools Coalition’s radical sex education program exposes Victorian children to very dangerous ideas, practices, and materials.” – Michael Sukkar (source: Facebook)
Karina Okotel, a former candidate, who according to this survey is also against safe schools will also be attending.
This event was done in close conjunction with the Chinese Liberals Association in Victoria, whose Chairman is the aforementioned Kelvin Ho. One of their senior members, George Hua, will be a main organiser.
Can a information session really be fair, when most of the speakers have a history opposing the Safe Schools program?
Ellen’s Bar, which is situated on Guangzhou Road, Nanjing in close proximity of many universities, so you can imagine there would be quite a few foreign customers. What made Ellen’s discriminatory policy so interesting, was that it relied solely on a language barrier.
Here’s a photo of the sign at the front counter of the bar. It says:
Free beer and whisky coke everyday up to 10:00pm
But this is where the problem begins. Silly old me, Australian born Chinese went to order a free beer. They refused to give it to me. They asked how I knew that they would give out free alcohol before 10pm. I said it’s right there on the counter in English. The bartender was perplexed, I could read the sign. He still refused to give me the drinks. I told him, that I was going to call the authorities if he didn’t, as he is discriminating against me, thinking I could not comprehend English. Anyway, I eventually got the drinks and he was noticeably peeved off.
Pretty much, their free drink policy for foreigners, was based on the hopes of Chinese people not being able to read the sign at their counter. Which sounds crazy, considering that Nanjing University is right next door and it is one of the premier insitutes of education in China, how could no other Chinese have noticed this sign?
What was really infuriating, was I noticed that all the Chinese customers, were taking out notes and their phone to pay for the actual drinks. This meant the owner of the bar was using Chinese money to stay afloat so foreigners could get free drinks.
I’m no stranger to the Chinese nightlife scene in terms of discriminatory pricing, it’s been an ongoing issue for probably longer than I’ve been alive. Where Caucasians generally get free entry, free drinks and free tables just based on their skin colour. It’s also hard to argue against, as everytime you do, there’ll be some crazy white supremacist types, who will defend it at all costs.
Sometimes it even includes weird interpretations of supply side economics, such at this example on Reddit. An expat asked for examples racism towards foreigners, and when he was hit with only examples of racism towards local Taiwanese, this gem of bad economics popped out.
Doesn’t sound like racism, sounds more like they’re trying to attract foreigners. If we’re thinking of the same Club Box, women get in for almost half price. That’s targeting demographics. Literally everything you described is targeting demographics, from higher salary (which you really should’ve negotiated) to lower entry fee.
But anyway, please boycott future establishments that dabble in such discriminatory policies.
Lin Shan Ju is definitely one of the most perplexing human beings to exist. Lin was apparently born in Taipei, and migrated to Australia. In terms of her career accolades they include:
Candidate for Katter’s Australian Party, a party with strong protectionist and Christian roots
Candidate for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party, a party famous for being anti-Asian, anti-Muslim and anti-multiculturalism. Lin was actually kicked from the One Nation Party, for being even too extreme for them. Her comments against the LGBTI community was just too much for even the posterchild party of bigotry in Australia.
President of the World Harmony Society, which makes little sense, as she herself is strongly against China who make up a large chunk of the world’s population.
Carrie Gracie, another so called non-Chinese ‘foreign expert’ has gone to the point of illustrating any opposition to the glorious Western thought as new ‘Red Guards’. She is writing from the perspective of a person who not received racial discrimination for their skin colour.